Indeed, despite the significant public opposition to this process, it has led to tremendous movement in Jordan’s political scene. There has been intense activity among youth political currents, alongside repositioning by existing parties who want to take advantage of constitutional amendments that expand access to the country’s political scene.
At the same time, legitimate questions remain about the credibility of official promises to reach a democratic model within a decade, wherein parliamentary parties would choose the government.
The irony, however, is that the “anti-modernisation” front is not a united political movement; rather, it comprises contradictory and antagonistic currents, along with broad social segments that have lost confidence in any hope for a Jordanian democracy that leads to genuine political change.
Opponents and sceptics of the royal committee run the gamut from right-wing, to left-wing, to Islamists. Some of the antagonism is focused on the potential consequences vis-a-vis the Palestinian situation, amid concerns that the modernisation programme is a prelude to the establishment of an alternative homeland for Palestinians in Jordan – a traditional scarecrow for many Jordanians.
Growing political awareness
It is important to note that the Jordanian right – which exalts the Jordanian identity and fears changing the state’s identity – has become an important player in the political scene, even if it is not organised. Prince Hamzah bin Hussein warned of the state of restlessness that characterises Jordanian tribes today, amid resentment and anger over economic conditions and high unemployment rates.
Standing alongside the Jordanian right is an elite group of traditional statesmen, from the old guard and the conservative current, who have historically stood against political reform. To them, the outcomes of the royal committee represent a threat to stability.
On the other side of the political spectrum, a stream of reformist forces – leftists, Islamists and liberals – either oppose the committee’s findings or remain neutral. Many have doubts about the seriousness of the state and the credibility of the reform project, as all previous attempts have ended badly.
So who actually stands with the committee? The internal balance of power is in its favour, and the king appears to be committed to its findings, promising to deliver on the recommended reforms. In the halls of power, this represents a new path for the country on the occasion of its centenary.
Alongside the king, there is a large segment of Jordanian youth who are thirsty for political action and for a platform to express their concerns and ambitions. Many Jordanian youths have received training in political and public work and are eager to get involved. We are witnessing an unprecedented state of readiness for political action.
Opposition to the modernisation drive is still present, with some promoting a narrative of fear over the problems democracy could bring in terms of social stability. But among official decision-making circles, there is a strong current that believes in the importance of change and development.
*Source: Middle East Eye – Read the Original Article